The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Upgrading to Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009
Do you like this story?
For customers looking to upgrade to Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009, the known and unknown organizational risks can appear as daunting as any technical complexity in the project.
According to Greg Kaupp from Dynamics NAV solution provider ArcherPoint, one of the complaints he's heard over the last 10 years working with Dynamics NAV is that if customers aren't careful, their upgrades become open-ended projects and can even become budget sinkholes.
One of the customer concerns that keeps cropping up about upgrading to Dynamics NAV 2009, Kaupp explained during a recent online meeting of the Dynamics NAV User Group, is that the cost of the upgrade is going to be double what was expected. But a lot of that comes from a misunderstanding around what it takes to get to the role tailored client, he said.
Done right, Kaupp says, an upgrade should be a nonevent.
...
This post was written by: Rahil Anouar
Rahil Anouar is a professional blogger, web designer and Linux user. Follow him on Twitter
0 Responses to “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Upgrading to Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009”
Post a Comment